Accessibility by Design

🔎 Project Overview

Accessibility was often treated as an afterthought in course and program design — something to fix once a student raised an issue. This reactive model created inequities, put students at risk, and burdened faculty with last-minute retrofits.

I led the Accessibility by Design Project at PSU to flip that script. Our goal was to make accessibility proactive and embedded — part of the DNA of every course, policy, and workflow.

🛠️ My Role

  • Authored PSU’s digital accessibility policies, aligning them with WCAG 2.1 and ADA standards.

  • Partnered with faculty, instructional designers, and IT to build accessibility checks into every course development workflow.

  • Developed and facilitated training modules on Universal Design for Learning (UDL), accessible multimedia, and inclusive assessment.

  • Established a continuous review loop for ongoing compliance and improvement.

📘 Deep-Dive Narrative

The project began with a simple observation: when accessibility is addressed late, students face barriers, faculty feel frustrated, and institutions fall short of their commitments.

I spearheaded a cross-campus initiative that reframed accessibility as a design principle, not a retrofit. This meant:

  • Every course template and syllabus included accessibility checkpoints.

  • Faculty were trained to use captioning, alt text, accessible documents, and UDL strategies from day one.

  • Instructional designers integrated equity reviews into their standard processes.

  • Policies and workflows were rewritten to reflect accessibility as a baseline expectation.

The cultural shift was profound. Faculty began to see accessibility not as a compliance box to check, but as part of their teaching philosophy — an act of inclusion and care for all learners.

“Excerpt from PSU’s Accessibility by Design framework — embedding WCAG and UDL principles directly into course and program design.”

Optional Resource Link:
View Full Accessibility by Design Presentation →

👥 Leadership in Action

This project required collaboration, advocacy, and persistence. Accessibility can be seen as a burden — so I worked to reframe it as an opportunity: a way to expand learning opportunities, improve outcomes, and align with PSU’s values.

As one faculty partner reflected:

“Molly helped us see accessibility not as something we had to fix later, but as something that made our teaching stronger from the start.”

✨ Key Outcomes

  • Institutional adoption of Accessibility by Design policies.

  • Integration of accessibility into course templates and workflows.

  • Faculty trained and empowered to design for all learners.

  • PSU strengthened its reputation for equity-driven innovation.

Previous
Previous

Competency-Based Learning Modules

Next
Next

Gates Foundation “Active + Adaptive” Initiative